David Silver is a billionaire, in a sense. The founder of the AI lab Ineffable Intelligence and former Google DeepMind researcher—famous for leading the AlphaGo project—has structured his wealth so that he will personally collect none of it. Instead, he has vowed to donate all future proceeds from the sale of his company to charity.

A New Wave of Techno-Philanthropy

Silver is part of a growing cohort of AI founders pledging their equity to charitable causes. This group includes Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of AI at Microsoft, and Anton Osika, founder of Lovable. This shift is highlighted by the rapid growth of Founders Pledge, a nonprofit that requires participants to enter into binding contracts. The value of pledges tracked by the organization has soared from $400 million in 2023 to $4 billion so far this year, with the AI industry now accounting for a third of the total.

Effective Altruism and Its Discontents

While many of these donors are influenced by "effective altruism," Silver emphasizes a "here and now" approach, targeting organizations like the Malaria Foundation to save lives immediately. However, this model of redistribution faces significant academic and social pushback.

Linsey McGoey, a professor of sociology, compares this type of philanthropy to calling upon an "arsonist to hose down the house he’s just set on fire." Critics argue that such donations often address the symptoms of wealth concentration rather than its systemic causes. Furthermore, researchers like Apolline Taillandier point out that these unelected donors gain significant power over global agendas—such as health policy at the WHO—without public accountability.

The Risk of Moral Accounting

There is also a concern that philanthropic pledges could serve as a moral justification for reckless behavior. The downfall of Sam Bankman-Fried serves as a cautionary tale of how the pursuit of wealth for "good" can lead to disastrous risk-taking. Silver denies that his pledge is a hedge against negative outcomes, arguing instead that it removes the personal greed that could lead AI development astray. For him, the responsibility of building superintelligence should not be driven by an "enormous dollar figure" on the horizon.